| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pilotmurph

Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 205
Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some pics from yesterday.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daa

Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 65
Location: FTC
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| them's nice pics. especially like being able to see the crown on the diamond and the entry shot of the man in red. assuming that's iron mt. vicinity, just how bad was the crust getting back to the ditch? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
distantfellow
Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 105
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had a good, short & easy, tour up Seven Utes this morning. I had high hopes for the Silver Cr. Drainage recon mission, but again I pussied out and settled for some R&R.
As the CAIC forecasted, a small cell over the Never Summers produced some limited precip. About half an inch in the lot when I got there, snowed all day, mostly just flurries, but it absolutely puked for a few minutes here and there. It was pretty windy too, and blowing the fresh precip around. I was surprised by the quality of snow up there. Obviously the Seven Utes area has been skied to death lately, but tracks from the weekend were practically filled in and I actually found some good freshies (sugar) here and there.
I'm sick of wallowing through sugar though. Bring on the styrofoam and corn, steep lines, helmets, whippets, long sunny days, beer, beer, beer, and BBQs.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mel
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 156
Location: Too close to Kansas
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Murph,
Fixed it for you.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
npg
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 5
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
As mentioned, originally set out for Nokhu this passed Saturday but that changed to the S-shaped line off Braddock as we got further up.
Ultimately, equipment failure stopped us a couple hundred feet from the ridge, but that certainly offered plenty of time to assess the snow.
NE aspect at 11.5k
Total depth = 145cm
Bottom 65cm was sugar
At a separate pit further below, we found similar sugar/slab formations but interestingly enough, the top 80cm was strong enough to withstand four full body jumps on a rutschblock. So while the recent freeze/thaw did a number on the top layers of the snowpack, that bottom sugar will probably last until mid April. If and when something avalanches, you can guarantee a 3-5' crown that will end disastrous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
g
Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 50
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Braddock? This is a new name for me, where does it come from. I have always understood the peak you refer to as "unnamed peak" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frenchy

Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 223
Location: Fort Collins
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Or more familiarly known as the Z couloir on No Name (if I read the post correctly)  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
npg
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 5
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Google Earth calls it Braddock; Summit Post calls is Point 11,960 which I think most know it as. Gmaps shows neither in topo view. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
d-rock

Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 144
Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
nice photoshoppin there, mel. Good pics also, Pilotmurph. Google maps has it labeled Braddock Peak, I've never heard of it. _________________ work it.....work it...... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
telejet9
Joined: 10 Nov 2008
Posts: 71
Location: Fort Fun, CO
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mel wrote: | Hey Murph,
Fixed it for you.
 |
If we actually get some snow, I could be tempted to do a front flip off that. All depends on the takeoff. Of course that looks more like a Lincoln Loop though. I haven't tried one of those yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ry_Guy

Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 177
Location: Fort Collins
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes as Frenchy mentioned the historic name among CP skiers is Z couloir on No Name. When it goes it goes huge!
So were you guys responsible for the lone track on the Z this weekend?
Ballsy line for sure! _________________ www.CameronPass.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
npg
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 5
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the head's up on the naming.
As for the lone line, it was a snowboarder and the tracks seemed to be a week old, if not at least a few days. On closeup view, the top portion looked rocky and he did nip a few on the first several turns before entering the lower 2/3 of the chute.
To the north side of No Name in the large east-facing bowl area, there were at least two moderate slides each about 150-200' wide, propagated near the top on rock bands that ran down about 400'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
camp4bum
Joined: 20 Jan 2010
Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| According to the USGS Mount Braddock was only officially named in November 2008 so it's no wonder that no one has heard of it yet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ry_Guy

Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 177
Location: Fort Collins
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jay dee
Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Posts: 42
Location: coloRADo
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:32 pm Post subject: Braddock? |
|
|
I don't think google earth skis at the pass "No Name" is far cooler and has historical/colloquial relevance. Just cuz it's on the interweb doesn't make it true/accurate  _________________ "And one of the things we've got to make sure that we do is anything" - GW Bush, Wash. DC, 5/7/2002
"When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|